Written by Lou Adler Created on Wednesday, 01 August 2012 Here are some basic truths about people regarding hiring and getting hired: 1. There are very few people who have an economic need to look for another job, are willing to take a lateral transfer, and are high achievers. Yet most companies spend most of their time and resources looking for these kinds of people. 2. The military has a tough screening process for selecting officers. But once selected â and with no experience â they are given some serious training and responsibilities far in excess of their current ability and are asked to deliver extraordinary results. Most of them succeed. Yet these same people when they leave the military arenât given a fair chance because they donât have the ârightâ experience. 3. There has been more research done on why people perform at peak levels, why they underperform, and why they leave jobs, but much of this is ignored when it comes to assessing competency and fit. Very little has to do with their level of experience. More of it has to do with their determination, discipline, motivation, and success doing somewhat related work in somewhat similar environments. Contact us if youâd like to apply this concept in your hiring process. 4. Candidates who are too eager turn people off, and those that arenât eager enough turn people off. Companies that are too eager when they find a hot prospect either turn them off, or pay too much to hire them. Asking insightful questions is a better way to demonstrate interest, whatever side of the desk youâre on. Itâs best to demonstrate eagerness by asking insightful and challenging questions. 5. Cultural fit is critically important â but few companies actually define it, and even fewer know how to measure it. For proof, ask the next 10 people you meet at your company to define its culture and how they would determine it during an interview. This is a good way to determine if your companyâs culture is real or imaginary. If youâre a candidate ask every interviewer the same question. 6. Most managers would hire a top achiever who is a little light on skills and experience and modify the job accordingly, but their hiring systems prevent them from ever seeing these people. 7. In the first 5-10 years of a personâs career, people who get promoted more rapidly or assigned to the toughest projects tend to have less experience than those who donât. Yet when we hire someone from the outside we want more experience. 8. First impressions and interview presentation skills do not predict on-the-job performance â even for sales positions â but most people think they do. Worse, we are all subconsciously affected by this whether we like it or not. With these basic truths in mind, hereâs my quick list of corrective actions for recruiters, hiring managers, candidates, and everyone else on the interviewing team: 1. If you donât know what it takes to be successful on the job in your company, donât interview any candidates until you do. How else are you going to determine competency, motivation, and fit? Hereâs an article that will show you how to figure this out. 2. If youâre a candidate being interviewed, and the person interviewing you doesnât know the job, ask this question: âWhat does the person taking this job need to accomplish in the first 6-12 months in order to be considered successful?â Then ask: âWhy is this important and what resources are available to pull this off?â If the person interviewing you is the hiring manager, and doesnât know the answer, or stumbles about, I would be concerned about taking the job if offered. To gain a sense of how concerned you should be, ask everyone else on the interviewing team the same question, and if each person gives you a different answer, be very concerned. If the recruiter doesnât know the answer, donât trust the recruiter to give you other honest information. It will be equally superficial. 3. If youâre a recruiter donât present an opportunity to anyone unless the hiring manager tells you what it takes to be successful on the job. If you do, youâll waste your time screening people on the wrong criteria. 4. If youâre a passive candidate talk to every recruiter who calls and see if they understand the real job, its importance to the company strategy, and how well the company is doing overall. Make sure you ask about the real culture, and get examples for proof. Make sure you ask these questions before you ask about the money or the location. If you filter jobs out too soon because of the money, youâll never get a chance to hear about true career opportunities. Most jobs can be scaled up or down to meet the needs of a top achiever, but youâll never get the chance if you measure opportunity by the wrong criteria. 5. From a career growth standpoint itâs better to be underpaid than overpaid. Compensation increases always follow performance, not lead it. So if and whenever you get the chance when changing jobs, donât fight for a big short-term compensation bump. Instead ask for a six month review based on your ability to hit challenging performance objectives. 6. If you instantly like a candidate, force yourself to ask the person tougher questions. If you donât like the candidate right away, force yourself to assume the person is extremely qualified, treat the person as you would a consultant, be respectful, and listen carefully to everything said. If you do this for just 30 minutes youâll be shocked. For one thing, youâll discover many of those you thought were initially tops are more personality than performance. Even better: there will be a few who initially turned you off who are great. These are the people that everyone else overlooked. From what Iâve seen over the past 30+ years, most hiring problems can be attributed to the